Abstract
This research addresses the need to incorporate the perceived threats of informal sanctions, specifically, shame and embarrassment, into the power-control model. First, the possibility that gender differences exist in the perceived threats of shame and embarrassment, as well as legal sanctions, and that these differences vary between more patriarchal and less patriarachal households of origin is explored. Second, the relative impact of the informal sanction threat variables compared with the formal legal sanctions is ascertained. Results indicate that significant gender differences exist in the perceived threats of embarrassment and formal sanctions, and that these differences vary by household of origin type. In addition, among those individuals reared in more patriarachal households, the perceived threat of shame accounts for a significant proportion of the gender-crime relationship.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 439-488 |
| Number of pages | 50 |
| Journal | Criminology |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 1 2000 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Scopus Subject Areas
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Perceived sanction threats, gender, and crime: A test and elaboration of power-control theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver