Post-test diagnostic accuracy measures under tree ordering of disease classes

Hani Samawi, Marwan Alsharman, Mario Keko, Jing Kersey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The medical field commonly employs post-test measures such as predictive values and likelihood ratios to assess diagnostic accuracy. Predictive values, including positive and negative values (PPV and NPV), indicate the probability that individuals have a target health condition based on test results. On the other hand, likelihood ratios, including positive and negative ratios (LR+ and LR− respectively), compare the probability of a particular test result between the diseased and non-diseased groups. While predictive values are useful in evaluating diagnostic test accuracy in populations with varying disease prevalence, likelihood ratios provide a direct link between pre-test and post-test probabilities in specific patients. In this study, we introduce and analyze a new approach called generalized predictive values and likelihood ratios, using a tree ordering of disease classes. We evaluate the effectiveness of these methods through simulation studies and illustrate their use with real data on lung cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5135-5159
Number of pages25
JournalStatistics in Medicine
Volume42
Issue number28
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 10 2023

Keywords

  • likelihood ratios
  • lung cancer disease
  • negative predictive value
  • positive predictive value
  • tree ordering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Post-test diagnostic accuracy measures under tree ordering of disease classes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this