Abstract
The medical field commonly employs post-test measures such as predictive values and likelihood ratios to assess diagnostic accuracy. Predictive values, including positive and negative values (PPV and NPV), indicate the probability that individuals have a target health condition based on test results. On the other hand, likelihood ratios, including positive and negative ratios (LR+ and LR− respectively), compare the probability of a particular test result between the diseased and non-diseased groups. While predictive values are useful in evaluating diagnostic test accuracy in populations with varying disease prevalence, likelihood ratios provide a direct link between pre-test and post-test probabilities in specific patients. In this study, we introduce and analyze a new approach called generalized predictive values and likelihood ratios, using a tree ordering of disease classes. We evaluate the effectiveness of these methods through simulation studies and illustrate their use with real data on lung cancer.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5135-5159 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Statistics in Medicine |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 28 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 18 2023 |
Keywords
- Humans
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Prevalence
- Probability
- Sensitivity and Specificity