Abstract
In this paper, we explore the effects of primary care physician (PCP) practice competition on five distinct quality metrics directly tied to screening, follow-up care, and prescribing behavior under Medicare Part B and D. Controlling for physician, practice, and area characteristics as well as zip code fixed effects, we find strong evidence that PCP practices in more concentrated areas provide lower quality of care. More specifically, PCPs in more concentrated areas are less likely to perform screening and follow-up care for high blood pressure, unhealthy bodyweight, and tobacco use. They are also less likely to document current medications. Furthermore, PCPs in more concentrated areas have a higher amount of opioid prescriptions as a fraction of total prescriptions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1048-1061 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Health Economics (United Kingdom) |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Scopus Subject Areas
- Health Policy
Keywords
- Medicare part B
- primary care competition
- quality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Primary care competition and quality of care: Empirical evidence from Medicare'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver