Race and the Construction of Evidence in Homicide Cases

Glenn L. Pierce, Michael L. Radelet, Chad Posick, Tim Lyman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Research that attempts to document racial or gender disparities in the criminal justice system inevitably paints a distorted picture if only one point in the criminal justice process is examined. For example, studies that look at who is sentenced to death among a group convicted of first-degree murder will miss exposure of biases that occur at earlier stages of the criminal justice process. In this paper, we looked at prosecutorial files on over 400 homicide cases from Caddo Parish, Louisiana (the Shreveport area). Results indicate that even after controlling for aggravating factors, cases with White female victims result in thicker files than other homicides, indicating more prosecutorial effort in attempting to secure convictions in such cases. This, in turn, was related to more severe sentencing of offenders convicted of killing whites and women. On the other hand, cases with black victims resulted in the thinnest case files and the least severe sentences.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalAmerican Journal of Criminal Justice
Volume39
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Keywords

  • Capital punishment
  • Discretion
  • Homicide investigations
  • Investigative and prosecutorial effort
  • Racial bias

DC Disciplines

  • Criminology
  • Criminology and Criminal Justice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Race and the Construction of Evidence in Homicide Cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this