Abstract
This response provides brief comments on Quantitative Reasoning (QR) lead chapters ( Johnson, this volume; Petrosino, this volume), then offers comments on the Introduction (Duschl et al, this volume). My responses are guided by the research and development conducted through the Pathways Project 1 , an NSF supported initiative to develop environmental literacy learning progressions. The Pathways QR team led efforts to incorporate QR into the science learning progressions, culminating in the formation of a QR learning progression. Hence, the response is from the perspective of QR as defined in this project.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Reconceptualizing STEM Education: The Central Role of Practices |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 8 2016 |
Keywords
- Quantitative reasoning
- Response
- Stem disciplines
DC Disciplines
- Curriculum and Instruction
- Education
- Educational Methods