Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Rethinking self-control and crime: Are all forms of impulsivity criminogenic?

  • CBRE
  • Bates College
  • Georgia Southern University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Traditionally, criminological research on impulsivity and crime assumes impulsivity is a uniform construct that is positively related to deviant behavior. However, psychological research on impulsivity indicates that the construct may have multiple forms, which vary in their relationship to antisocial behavior. One possibility that few studies have examined is whether some forms of impulsivity are unrelated, or negatively related, to antisocial behavior. This study uses Dickman’s (1990) functional and dysfunctional impulsivity scales and finds that dysfunctional impulsivity is a better predictor of crime than functional impulsivity, but does not differ for substance use or school deviance. These results highlight ways that impulsivity measures can be refined in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)523-541
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Journal of Criminology
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Law

Keywords

  • delinquency
  • dysfunctional impulsivity
  • functional impulsivity
  • Impulsivity
  • self-control

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking self-control and crime: Are all forms of impulsivity criminogenic?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this