Rhetorical Strategies in Union Organizing: A Case of Labor Versus Management

Ted M. Brimeyer, Andrea V. Eaker, Robin Patric Clair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study examines a union organizing campaign to assess the rhetorical strategies used by both union organizers and management. Bowers and Ochs’s typology of agitation and control rhetoric is used to analyze these strategies. The union organizers relied on promulgation (e.g., sarcasm, co-opting company messages, and straightforward explanation), polarization, and solidification to gain worker support and later added specific forms of focusing on the issue, visualizing the future, making personal testimonials, using repetition, and having the last word. Management relied on counter persuasion, which included diversion of attention, drawbacks of change, images of a negative future, education, sarcasm, and polarization to resist the organizing effort. The analysis underscored the importance of examining labor organizing campaigns from a rhetorical perspective. Future studies concerning organizing campaigns are discussed.
Original languageAmerican English
JournalManagement Communication Quarterly
Volume18
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004

Keywords

  • Labor
  • Labor organizing
  • Management
  • Rhetoric
  • Rhetorical strategies

DC Disciplines

  • Sociology
  • Anthropology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rhetorical Strategies in Union Organizing: A Case of Labor Versus Management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this