Should We “just Stick to the Facts”? The Benefit of Controversial Conversations in Classrooms

Elizabeth Kraatz, Jacqueline von Spiegel, Robin Sayers, Anna C. Brady

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Controversial topics may be uncomfortable for teachers to include in their in-class discussions. However, there are considerable cognitive and social-emotional benefits to engagement in controversial conversations, or classroom discussion about controversial topics. It is critical that teachers support students in respectful discussion to help them develop skills such as problem solving, critical thinking, and the ability to consider issues from multiple perspectives. These skills can enable students to meet larger educational goals such as engaged citizenship. The goal of this article is to highlight the benefits of controversial conversations in the classroom and describe teaching approaches that facilitate effective controversial conversations. First, we identify important factors for teachers’ consideration in supporting effective and beneficial controversial conversations. Second, we provide examples of topics of conversations that may be appropriate for students of varying ages. Third, we review how the structure of conversation, scaffolding, classroom context, relationships, and students’ individual differences can shape controversial conversations.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalTheory into Practice
Volume61
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 30 2022

DC Disciplines

  • Educational Methods
  • Curriculum and Social Inquiry
  • Curriculum and Instruction
  • Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should We “just Stick to the Facts”? The Benefit of Controversial Conversations in Classrooms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this