TY - JOUR
T1 - Soil organic matter prediction using smartphone-captured digital images
T2 - Use of reflectance image and image perturbation
AU - Gorthi, Srikanth
AU - Swetha, R. K.
AU - Chakraborty, Somsubhra
AU - Li, Bin
AU - Weindorf, David C.
AU - Dutta, Sudarshan
AU - Banerjee, Hirak
AU - Das, Krishnendu
AU - Majumdar, Kaushik
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 IAgrE
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - This study evaluated a novel smartphone-based soil image segmentation technique and subsequent machine learning (ML) optimization methodology with a set of soil images for rapidly predicting soil organic matter (SOM) with minimal soil processing. A smartphone and a custom-made box were used to capture images for 90 soil samples, collected from three different agroclimatic zones of West Bengal, India under three different illumination conditions. To offset the impact of variable illumination, the reflectance component of the image was recovered by removing the illumination from the image. Further, to deceive the ML model without distorting the soil image, an adversarial image was generated by adding Gaussian noise to the image. A Tree-based Pipeline Optimisation Tool was used to find an optimum ML stacking scheme using six different ML models. Model validation statistics indicated that reflectance image-extracted sub-colour space could predict SOM with reasonable accuracy (R2 = 0.88, RMSE = 0.28%) using original images in stack one. Moreover, the sub-colour space using perturbed images in stack one could sense noise, worsening the model validation (R2 = 0.79, RMSE = 0.36%). Conversely, seven out of eight tested colour spaces in stack two were unable to sense the image noise, producing higher validation performance than the original images. The proposed smartphone-based image acquisition setup combined with the computer vision and ML pipeline produced an important advance in affordable optical tool-based SOM prediction with significant time and cost savings. More research is warranted to extend this approach by incorporating field images of variable soil types taken under variable illuminations.
AB - This study evaluated a novel smartphone-based soil image segmentation technique and subsequent machine learning (ML) optimization methodology with a set of soil images for rapidly predicting soil organic matter (SOM) with minimal soil processing. A smartphone and a custom-made box were used to capture images for 90 soil samples, collected from three different agroclimatic zones of West Bengal, India under three different illumination conditions. To offset the impact of variable illumination, the reflectance component of the image was recovered by removing the illumination from the image. Further, to deceive the ML model without distorting the soil image, an adversarial image was generated by adding Gaussian noise to the image. A Tree-based Pipeline Optimisation Tool was used to find an optimum ML stacking scheme using six different ML models. Model validation statistics indicated that reflectance image-extracted sub-colour space could predict SOM with reasonable accuracy (R2 = 0.88, RMSE = 0.28%) using original images in stack one. Moreover, the sub-colour space using perturbed images in stack one could sense noise, worsening the model validation (R2 = 0.79, RMSE = 0.36%). Conversely, seven out of eight tested colour spaces in stack two were unable to sense the image noise, producing higher validation performance than the original images. The proposed smartphone-based image acquisition setup combined with the computer vision and ML pipeline produced an important advance in affordable optical tool-based SOM prediction with significant time and cost savings. More research is warranted to extend this approach by incorporating field images of variable soil types taken under variable illuminations.
KW - Illumination
KW - Image reflectance
KW - Perturbation validation
KW - Random forest
KW - Smartphone
KW - Soil organic matter
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110188312&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.06.018
DO - 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.06.018
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85110188312
SN - 1537-5110
VL - 209
SP - 154
EP - 169
JO - Biosystems Engineering
JF - Biosystems Engineering
ER -