Students’ academic motivation and grade estimation accuracy in a Human Anatomy and Physiology class

Diana Botnaru; Trent W Maurer; Deborah Allen; Delena Bell Gatch; Padmini Shankar

Students’ academic motivation and grade estimation accuracy in a Human Anatomy and Physiology class

Georgia Southern University

Research output: Contribution to conference › Presentation

Abstract

Presentation given at Annual HAPS conference, Jacksonville, FL. <a href="https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.hapsweb.org/resource/resmgr/Conference/HAPS-2014_Conference_Program.pdf" target="_self"> Program </a> The study investigated student academic motivation using the adapted Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) and examined differences between student expected grade and actual grades in an undergraduate Human Anatomy and Physiology (HAP) class. Results showed that only the Stimulation subscale of the AMS changed over time, while estimated GPA, expected grade, hours studying, HAPI or II and introjected and external subscales of the AMS were significant predictors of final grades. Across both HAPI and HAPII, 75% of students overestimated their final grade. Three variables were significant in predicting the grade difference: class sequence (HAPI vs. HAPII); GPA and study hours.

Original language	American English
State	Published - May 1 2014
Event	Annual HAPS conference - Duration: May 1 2014 → …

Conference

Conference	Annual HAPS conference
Period	05/1/14 → …

Disciplines

Human Ecology

Cite this

@conference{9c8a0f392989488e8f1b13cac346f376,

title = "Students{\textquoteright} academic motivation and grade estimation accuracy in a Human Anatomy and Physiology class",

abstract = " Presentation given at Annual HAPS conference, Jacksonville, FL. Program The study investigated student academic motivation using the adapted Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) and examined differences between student expected grade and actual grades in an undergraduate Human Anatomy and Physiology (HAP) class. Results showed that only the Stimulation subscale of the AMS changed over time, while estimated GPA, expected grade, hours studying, HAPI or II and introjected and external subscales of the AMS were significant predictors of final grades. Across both HAPI and HAPII, 75\% of students overestimated their final grade. Three variables were significant in predicting the grade difference: class sequence (HAPI vs. HAPII); GPA and study hours.",

author = "Diana Botnaru and Maurer, \{Trent W\} and Deborah Allen and Gatch, \{Delena Bell\} and Padmini Shankar",

year = "2014",

month = may,

day = "1",

language = "American English",

note = "Annual HAPS conference ; Conference date: 01-05-2014",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Students’ academic motivation and grade estimation accuracy in a Human Anatomy and Physiology class

AU - Botnaru, Diana

AU - Maurer, Trent W

AU - Allen, Deborah

AU - Gatch, Delena Bell

AU - Shankar, Padmini

PY - 2014/5/1

Y1 - 2014/5/1

N2 - Presentation given at Annual HAPS conference, Jacksonville, FL. Program The study investigated student academic motivation using the adapted Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) and examined differences between student expected grade and actual grades in an undergraduate Human Anatomy and Physiology (HAP) class. Results showed that only the Stimulation subscale of the AMS changed over time, while estimated GPA, expected grade, hours studying, HAPI or II and introjected and external subscales of the AMS were significant predictors of final grades. Across both HAPI and HAPII, 75% of students overestimated their final grade. Three variables were significant in predicting the grade difference: class sequence (HAPI vs. HAPII); GPA and study hours.

AB - Presentation given at Annual HAPS conference, Jacksonville, FL. Program The study investigated student academic motivation using the adapted Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) and examined differences between student expected grade and actual grades in an undergraduate Human Anatomy and Physiology (HAP) class. Results showed that only the Stimulation subscale of the AMS changed over time, while estimated GPA, expected grade, hours studying, HAPI or II and introjected and external subscales of the AMS were significant predictors of final grades. Across both HAPI and HAPII, 75% of students overestimated their final grade. Three variables were significant in predicting the grade difference: class sequence (HAPI vs. HAPII); GPA and study hours.

UR - https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ecology-facpres/502

M3 - Presentation

T2 - Annual HAPS conference

Y2 - 1 May 2014

ER -

Students’ academic motivation and grade estimation accuracy in a Human Anatomy and Physiology class

Abstract

Conference

Disciplines

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this