TY - JOUR
T1 - Supplemental Insurance and Racial Health Disparities under Medicare Part B
AU - Brunt, Christopher S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Health Research and Educational Trust
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - Objective: To assess the impact of preferences, socioeconomic status (SES), and supplemental insurance (SI) on racial/ethnic disparities in the probability and use of services at physicians' offices, hospitals, and emergency departments among Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Part B. Research Design and Subjects: This study includes black and white beneficiaries from the 2009–2011 panel of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey who were enrolled in Medicare Part B. Logit and negative binomial multivariate regression analysis were used in conjunction with rank-and-replace methods to determine factors influencing utilization and black–white utilization disparities. Principal Findings: Among Part B beneficiaries, significant disparities exist for each studied service. Examining contributing factors, 12–19 percent of the black–white health-adjusted difference in the probability of use is explained by differences in SES, whereas differences in the distribution of SI accounts for 20 percent or more. For volume, SES is found to account for 2–11 percent of differences with SI making up another 9–10 percent. Conclusions: A substantial portion of the difference in black–white beneficiary use of outpatient services is due to SI. Policies aimed at increasing coverage are likely to increase the probability of visits with modest increases in volume.
AB - Objective: To assess the impact of preferences, socioeconomic status (SES), and supplemental insurance (SI) on racial/ethnic disparities in the probability and use of services at physicians' offices, hospitals, and emergency departments among Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Part B. Research Design and Subjects: This study includes black and white beneficiaries from the 2009–2011 panel of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey who were enrolled in Medicare Part B. Logit and negative binomial multivariate regression analysis were used in conjunction with rank-and-replace methods to determine factors influencing utilization and black–white utilization disparities. Principal Findings: Among Part B beneficiaries, significant disparities exist for each studied service. Examining contributing factors, 12–19 percent of the black–white health-adjusted difference in the probability of use is explained by differences in SES, whereas differences in the distribution of SI accounts for 20 percent or more. For volume, SES is found to account for 2–11 percent of differences with SI making up another 9–10 percent. Conclusions: A substantial portion of the difference in black–white beneficiary use of outpatient services is due to SI. Policies aimed at increasing coverage are likely to increase the probability of visits with modest increases in volume.
KW - access/demand/utilization of services
KW - health economics
KW - Medicare
KW - Racial/ethnic differences in health and health care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033496658&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1475-6773.12599
DO - 10.1111/1475-6773.12599
M3 - Article
C2 - 27859057
AN - SCOPUS:85033496658
SN - 0017-9124
VL - 52
SP - 2197
EP - 2218
JO - Health Services Research
JF - Health Services Research
IS - 6
ER -