Abstract
Balyeat, et. al. (2013, this journal) suggest that IRR does not have a clear economic interpretation and that MIRR highlights the reinvestment assumptions of NPV and IRR thus increasing its value as a teaching tool. This comment addresses misconceptions found in the work of Balyeat, et. al. In particular, it reiterates the economic interpretation of IRR and reexamines the alleged reinvestment rate assumptions.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Economics and Finance Education |
Volume | 12 |
State | Published - Jan 1 2013 |
Keywords
- Economics
- Finance
- IRR
- Investment performance
- MIRR
DC Disciplines
- Business Administration, Management, and Operations
- Economics
- Finance
- Finance and Financial Management