Teaching MIRR to Improve Comprehension of Investment Performance Evaluation Techniques: A Comment

John Hatem, Ken Johnston, Bill Z. Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Balyeat, et. al. (2013, this journal) suggest that IRR does not have a clear economic interpretation and that MIRR highlights the reinvestment assumptions of NPV and IRR thus increasing its value as a teaching tool. This comment addresses misconceptions found in the work of Balyeat, et. al. In particular, it reiterates the economic interpretation of IRR and reexamines the alleged reinvestment rate assumptions.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalJournal of Economics and Finance Education
Volume12
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Keywords

  • Economics
  • Finance
  • IRR
  • Investment performance
  • MIRR

DC Disciplines

  • Business Administration, Management, and Operations
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Finance and Financial Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Teaching MIRR to Improve Comprehension of Investment Performance Evaluation Techniques: A Comment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this