Abstract
Using a stochastic frontier model with industry-level data, the sources of Russian economic growth during the expansion (6.45% annual growth) of 2000–2008 and the stagnation (1.75% annual growth) of 2010–2016 are examined. Changes in industrial structure had almost no impact on growth in either period. Russia’s extended mining complex played a crucial role in economic growth, since it accounted for one-quarter of aggregate production and was at the core of the state’s natural resource rent management system (RMS). The elasticities of labour and capital inputs with respect to the world oil price were low overall and across industry groups. The RMS may mitigate the impact of fluctuations in world oil price on the economy and hamper productivity-driven growth. While technological advances and rising production efficiency accounted for half of the growth in the expansion period, slower technology-driven growth and falling efficiency were the main factors behind the stagnation. The transformation of the economy from a primarily market-driven system to one dominated by a kleptocratic state and crony corporations is likely behind the reversal of the efficiency trend.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-28 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Post-Communist Econ. |
| DOIs | |
| State | E-pub ahead of print - Feb 1 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Scopus Subject Areas
- Economics and Econometrics
Keywords
- Production function
- economic growth
- efficiency
- industrial structure
- natural resources rents
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The ABCs of Russia's post-transition growth: what went wrong?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver