The Community as Client: Improving the Prospects for Useful Evaluation Findings

Joseph Telfair; Laura C. Leviton

doi:10.1002/ev.1142

The Community as Client: Improving the Prospects for Useful Evaluation Findings

Joseph Telfair, Laura C. Leviton

Health Policy & Community Health

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Interviews with leaders of community-based health initiatives help define meaningful evaluation in contexts in which communities are called on to contribute consent, resources, or participation in program development and research.

Original language	American English
Journal	New Directions for Evaluation
Volume	1999
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1142
State	Published - Sep 1999

Disciplines

Public Health
Medicine and Health Sciences

Keywords

Clients
Communities
Evaluation
Public health

Access to Document

10.1002/ev.1142License: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{bede38e75bdf49e8a97f10527d43c8c1,

title = "The Community as Client: Improving the Prospects for Useful Evaluation Findings",

abstract = " Interviews with leaders of community-based health initiatives help define meaningful evaluation in contexts in which communities are called on to contribute consent, resources, or participation in program development and research.",

keywords = "Clients, Communities, Evaluation, Public health",

author = "Joseph Telfair and Leviton, {Laura C.}",

note = "Interviews with leaders of community‐based health initiatives help define meaningful evaluation in contexts in which communities are called on to contribute consent, resources, or participation in program...",

year = "1999",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1002/ev.1142",

language = "American English",

volume = "1999",

journal = "New Directions for Evaluation",

issn = "1097-6736",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Community as Client: Improving the Prospects for Useful Evaluation Findings

AU - Telfair, Joseph

AU - Leviton, Laura C.

N1 - Interviews with leaders of community‐based health initiatives help define meaningful evaluation in contexts in which communities are called on to contribute consent, resources, or participation in program...

PY - 1999/9

Y1 - 1999/9

N2 - Interviews with leaders of community-based health initiatives help define meaningful evaluation in contexts in which communities are called on to contribute consent, resources, or participation in program development and research.

AB - Interviews with leaders of community-based health initiatives help define meaningful evaluation in contexts in which communities are called on to contribute consent, resources, or participation in program development and research.

KW - Clients

KW - Communities

KW - Evaluation

KW - Public health

UR - https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ev.1142

U2 - 10.1002/ev.1142

DO - 10.1002/ev.1142

M3 - Article

SN - 1097-6736

VL - 1999

JO - New Directions for Evaluation

JF - New Directions for Evaluation

ER -

The Community as Client: Improving the Prospects for Useful Evaluation Findings

Abstract

Disciplines

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this