Abstract
Recent research has shown a memory advantage for minimally counterintuitive (MCI) concepts, over concepts that are either intuitive (INT) or maximally counterintuitive (MXCI), although the general result is heavily affected by context. Items from one such study were given to subjects who were asked to create novel stories using at least three concepts from a list containing all three types. Results indicated a preference for using MCI items (as in the recall studies), and further disclosed two styles of usage, an accommodative style and an assimilative style. The results extend recent memory research and suggest extensions to recent theories intended to explain the prevalence of counterintuitive religious concepts.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Cognition & Culture |
Volume | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 2006 |
DC Disciplines
- Arts and Humanities
- Philosophy