Abstract
US Federal Regulations require at least two pivotal proofs of efficacy clinical trials (typically Phase III) to support approval of a drug for a specific indication. In the clinical development of drugs to treat panic disorder, one of these trials may incorporate a forced titration design while the other may incorporate a flexible titration - according to response design. Standard analysis approaches include treatment group comparisons at each follow-up visit in terms of variables reflecting domains of the panic condition. Such designs pose challenges as to: (1) characterizing the dose response profile across both studies; {2) characterizing duration of effect; (3) characterizing withdrawal effects; and (4) the choice of appropriate statistical analysis methods. Standard approaches to meeting these challenges, as well as reasonable alternatives are presented.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Journal | The Philippine Statistician |
| Volume | 56 |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2007 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Disciplines
- Biostatistics
- Community Health
- Public Health
Keywords
- Pivotal
- Clinical trials
- Panic disorder
- Duration of effect
- Withdrawals
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Design and Analysis of Pivotal Proof of Efficacy Trials in the Development of Drugs to Treat Panic Disorder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver