The Energy Flow For A Spherical Acoustic Lens: Ray vs. Wave Methods

Cleon Dean, James P. Braselton

Research output: Contribution to conferencePresentation

Abstract

A simple classroom demonstration consists of a weather balloon filled with carbon dioxide, a sound source, and a microphone. Since the speed of sound is slower in carbon dioxide than in air at room temperature and pressure, the balloon acts as a positive spherical acoustic lens. The accuracy of ray methods in locating the acoustic focus versus a full blown wave solution approach is probed. This problem presents particular difficulties if the sound source lies in the near field region. The sound emitter is treated as a dipole source equivalent to a rigid oscillating sphere of small size and amplitude of motion relative to the scatterer. The energy flux around the balloon is visualized by both ray methods and by the acoustic Poynting vector field. The geometrical ray results and the acoustic Poynting vector field resulting from the wave solution are compared. © 2008 Acoustical Society of America

Original languageAmerican English
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008
EventThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America -
Duration: Apr 1 2009 → …

Conference

ConferenceThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Period04/1/09 → …

Keywords

  • Water balloon
  • Energy flux
  • Ray methods
  • Poynting vector field

DC Disciplines

  • Physics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Energy Flow For A Spherical Acoustic Lens: Ray vs. Wave Methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this