Abstract
This project reports the results of two studies that investigated the impact on course evaluations of using partial credit iterative responding (PCIR) with the Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique (IF-AT) forms on summative course assessments. This project also quantifies grade inflation from utilizing different PCIR schemes and documents the percentage of possible partial credit students earned. Study 1 compared evaluations in courses where exams were manipulated. Study 2 compared evaluations in courses where daily reading quizzes were manipulated. Results from Study 1 revealed that multiple course evaluation scores increased 10% in the PCIR condition. Students earned 75% of the partial credit available through PCIR, which resulted in a 10% increase in their exam scores. Results from Study 2 revealed no difference in course evaluations between conditions. Students earned roughly 40% of the partial credit available through PCIR, resulting in a 4 to 8% increase in their quiz scores, depending on the PCIR scheme.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 31-46 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Teaching & Learning Inquiry |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2015 |
Scopus Subject Areas
- Education
Keywords
- Course evaluations
- Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique (IF-AT)
- Multiple choice exams
- Partial credit iterative responding
- Quizzes