TY - JOUR
T1 - The relationship between ethical ideology and ethical behavior intentions
T2 - An exploratory look at physicians' responses to managed care dilemmas
AU - Eastman, Jacqueline K.
AU - Eastman, Kevin L.
AU - Tolson, Michael A.
N1 - Within the past few years, managed care health insurance programs have become commonplace. With managed care programs, however, physicians are facing increasing ethical pressures. This paper examines the relationship between physicians' behavior intentions with respect to four managed care ethical scenarios and their responses to Forsyth's (1980) Ethics Position Questionnaire (EPQ).
PY - 2001/6
Y1 - 2001/6
N2 - Within the past few years, managed care health insurance programs have become commonplace. With managed care programs, however physicians are facing increasing ethical pressures. This paper examines the relationship between physicians' behavior intentions with respect to four managed care ethical scenarios and their responses to Forsyth's (1980) Ethics Position Questionnaire (EPQ). This is one of the first papers to compare this scale to behavioral intentions in the workplace. We provide a literature review of the ethical dilemmas that doctors face under a managed care system and conduct a national random sample of general practitioners and surgeons regarding the four managed care ethical dilemmas. The results show that the doctors surveyed are significantly more idealistic than relativistic. In relating the EPQ to the ethical scenarios, however, there was no support for the proposition that ethical ideology was related to the ethical behavioral intentions. This suggests more research is needed to establish the links between ethical positions, attitudes, and behavioral intentions. Finally, there were little differences in EPQ scores by practice or demographic variables, the only significant result being that general surgeons are significantly more idealistic than family practitioners.
AB - Within the past few years, managed care health insurance programs have become commonplace. With managed care programs, however physicians are facing increasing ethical pressures. This paper examines the relationship between physicians' behavior intentions with respect to four managed care ethical scenarios and their responses to Forsyth's (1980) Ethics Position Questionnaire (EPQ). This is one of the first papers to compare this scale to behavioral intentions in the workplace. We provide a literature review of the ethical dilemmas that doctors face under a managed care system and conduct a national random sample of general practitioners and surgeons regarding the four managed care ethical dilemmas. The results show that the doctors surveyed are significantly more idealistic than relativistic. In relating the EPQ to the ethical scenarios, however, there was no support for the proposition that ethical ideology was related to the ethical behavioral intentions. This suggests more research is needed to establish the links between ethical positions, attitudes, and behavioral intentions. Finally, there were little differences in EPQ scores by practice or demographic variables, the only significant result being that general surgeons are significantly more idealistic than family practitioners.
UR - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1010793118936
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0035373518
U2 - 10.1023/a:1010793118936
DO - 10.1023/a:1010793118936
M3 - Article
SN - 0167-4544
VL - 31
SP - 209
EP - 224
JO - Journal of Business Ethics
JF - Journal of Business Ethics
IS - 3
ER -