Abstract
Accountability measures have quickly entered into formal teacher-preparation programs. As a response, we introduce the use of structural equation modeling vis-à-vis path analysis in secondary-grade mathematics teacher preparation as a methodology to test models to understand the strength of relationships to recommendations of prominent professional organizations and standards for entering the teaching profession. This longitudinal, 6-year, five-cohort study examines the relationship of program design sequencing and core components (internal measures) to an externally scored high-stakes teacher licensing examination portfolio intended to measure pedagogical content knowledge and first-year teacher readiness. The internal measures and program sequencing model explains 49.2% of the variance in relation to the standardized outcome teaching portfolio examination with high-power and medium- to large-effect statistics. We provide implications for teacher preparation with respect to recommendations of professional organizations, governments, and accreditation standards. Results should stimulate discussions and fuel future research efforts.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 58-75 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Journal of Teacher Education |
Volume | 75 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 2024 |
Keywords
- accountability
- assessment
- educational policy
- mathematics teacher education
- path analysis
- program design
- teacher education preparation