Abstract
Social support generally is considered a valuable asset that may compensate for health service deficiencies among rural populations. Employing a mixed methods approach, we explored how vulnerable rural residents described social support in the context of self-management for multiple chronic conditions. Participants generally felt support was available, though emotional/informational support was perceived as less available than other types of support. Participants did not rely heavily on informal support to help them manage their multiple morbidities, preferring to call on their doctor and their own resources. We discuss implications of these findings for meeting this vulnerable population's self-management needs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 756-771 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Scopus Subject Areas
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Keywords
- Appalachian region
- Rural health
- Social support
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The role of social support in multiple morbidity: Self-management among rural residents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver