Abstract
In this paper we examine Puentedura’s (2006) Substitution - Augmentation - Modification - Redefinition (SAMR) model for K-12 technology integration. Despite its increased use among practitioners, to date the model has not been included within scholarly debate. We analyze the SAMR model in light of extant educational technology literature and using an analytic approach, our exploration and analysis centers on an identification of the model's four core tiers. We aim to provide insights into the model’s shortcomings, as it is used to represent technology integration as a four-tiered, task-based, hierarchical process. Our analysis suggests that the SAMR model limits practitioners’ understanding of the complexity of integrating technology to support and enhance all levels of teaching and learning.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
State | Published - Apr 2015 |
Event | Paper presented at meeting American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting - Duration: Apr 1 2015 → … |
Conference
Conference | Paper presented at meeting American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting |
---|---|
Period | 04/1/15 → … |
Disciplines
- Educational Administration and Supervision
- Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research
- Educational Leadership
Keywords
- K-12 technology integration
- Puentedura SAMR mdoel
- SAMR
- Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefintion