Trading Off Learning and Performance: Exploration and Exploitation at Work

Lindsey M. Greco, Steven Charlier, Kenneth G. Brown, Steven D. Charlier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Employees are increasingly given control over how they learn, and their choices for training are diverse and varied, yet employees must balance competing demands. On one hand, they are expected to be increasingly efficient in their current job duties – on the other hand, they are expected to develop new skills and competencies that enable them to adapt and respond to changing job demands. Drawing from the organizational learning literature, we propose a model of worker and work characteristics that inform choices between two mindsets related to learning at work. The first mindset is exploration, or the pursuit of learning outside one's current knowledge domain; the second mindset is exploitation, the refinement/deepening of one's existing knowledge stock focusing on the task at hand. We further propose that these strategic choices, or trade-offs, influence employee learning and performance in unique ways, with different implications for both routine and adaptive performance. Finally, we incorporate the notions of feedback loops and risk assessments that influence ongoing decisions between exploration and exploitation mindsets. Recommendations for future research and extensions of the theoretical model are also proposed.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalHuman Resource Management Review
Volume29
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 24 2018

Keywords

  • Exploration and exploitation
  • Individual differences
  • Learning
  • Microfoundations
  • Training and development

DC Disciplines

  • Business Administration, Management, and Operations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trading Off Learning and Performance: Exploration and Exploitation at Work'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this