Unmasking the sky: high-resolution PM2.5 prediction in Texas using machine learning techniques

Kai Zhang, Jeffrey Lin, Yuanfei Li, Yue Sun, Weitian Tong, Fangyu Li, Lung Chang Chien, Yiping Yang, Wei Chung Su, Hezhong Tian, Peng Fu, Fengxiang Qiao, Xiaobo Xue Romeiko, Shao Lin, Sheng Luo, Elena Craft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Although PM2.5 (fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 µm) is an air pollutant of great concern in Texas, limited regulatory monitors pose a significant challenge for decision-making and environmental studies. Objective: This study aimed to predict PM2.5 concentrations at a fine spatial scale on a daily basis by using novel machine learning approaches and incorporating satellite-derived Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) and a variety of weather and land use variables. Methods: We compiled a comprehensive dataset in Texas from 2013 to 2017, including ground-level PM2.5 concentrations from regulatory monitors; AOD values at 1-km resolution based on images retrieved from the MODIS satellite; and weather, land-use, population density, among others. We built predictive models for each year separately to estimate PM2.5 concentrations using two machine learning approaches called gradient boosted trees and random forest. We evaluated the model prediction performance using in-sample and out-of-sample validations. Results: Our predictive models demonstrate excellent in-sample model performance, as indicated by high R2 values generated from the gradient boosting models (0.94–0.97) and random forest models (0.81–0.90). However, the out-of-sample R2 values fall within a range of 0.52–0.75 for gradient boosting models and 0.44–0.69 for random forest models. Model performance varies slightly across years. A generally decreasing trend in predicted PM2.5 concentrations over time is observed in Eastern Texas. Impact statement: We utilized machine learning approaches to predict PM2.5 levels in Texas. Both gradient boosting and random forest models perform well. Gradient boosting models perform slightly better than random forest models. Our models showed excellent in-sample prediction performance (R2 > 0.9).

Keywords

  • AOD
  • Gradient boosting
  • Machine learning
  • PM
  • Random forest

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unmasking the sky: high-resolution PM2.5 prediction in Texas using machine learning techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this