Unpacking the experience of individuals engaging in incentivized false (and genuine) positive reviews: The impact on brand satisfaction

Sıddık Bozkurt, Emma Welch, David Gligor, Nichole Gligor, Vipul Garg, Kishore Gopalakrishna Pillai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, we seek to understand how an exchange, where a consumer receives a product from a brand and, in return, leaves an incentivized false positive review, affects that consumer and his/her relationship with that brand. We seek to do that by comparing the impact of leaving an incentivized false positive review to that of leaving an incentivized genuine positive review. We conducted two online experiments to explore whether leaving an incentivized false positive review (vs. incentivized genuine positive review) leads customers to feel guilty, impacting their satisfaction with the brand. To offer a more comprehensive understanding of these relationships, we also investigated whether customers’ levels of amorality and intrinsic religiosity affect the impact of leaving an incentivized (false and genuine) positive review on guilt and customer satisfaction. Our findings allow us to suggest several interesting theoretical and managerial implications.

Original languageEnglish
Article number114077
JournalJournal of Business Research
Volume165
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2023
Externally publishedYes

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Marketing

Keywords

  • Amorality
  • Guilt
  • Incentivized false positive reviews
  • Incentivized genuine positive reviews
  • Intrinsic Religiosity
  • Satisfaction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unpacking the experience of individuals engaging in incentivized false (and genuine) positive reviews: The impact on brand satisfaction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this