Utilization and Utility of Institutional Administrative and Student Affairs Assessment Resources

Cynthia D. Groover, Juliann Sergi McBrayer, Richard Cleveland, Amy Jo Riggs, Richard E. Cleveland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Many institutions implement assessment teams as resources to develop faculty and staff knowledge of and confidence in programmatic assessment processes. Additional resources may include rubrics or peer review and feedback, but effectiveness of these resources is rarely evaluated. Programmatic assessment allows institutions to examine the impact of multiple resources to determine which positively impact assessment outcomes. This quantitative study examined administrative and student affairs units' perceptions of assessment resources supported by the Office of Institutional Effectiveness (OIE) at one large public, southeastern university. The findings corroborated the positive impact of rubrics and peer review and feedback, providing a basis for continued support of many of the institution's existing resources. Although institutions cannot control the utilization of resources available, they can be more certain that the resources provided are beneficial to those who seek them.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalResearch & Practice in Assessment
Volume14
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Keywords

  • Administrator attitudes
  • Administrator surveys
  • Data use
  • Evaluation utilization
  • Feedback (response)
  • Institutional evaluation
  • Peer evaluation
  • Researchers
  • Scoring rubrics
  • Student personnel services
  • Student personnel workers

DC Disciplines

  • Educational Administration and Supervision
  • Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research
  • Educational Leadership

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Utilization and Utility of Institutional Administrative and Student Affairs Assessment Resources'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this